Gray v. MIF of San Francisco
After she was injured in an automobile accident, appellant Vanessa Gray sued respondents Claudia Mejia, Oscar Perez, and Perezs employer, MIF of San Francisco, Inc., dba Village Imports, alleging negligence.[1] Gray contends that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of payments for her injuries from a collateral source. Court conclude that Gray has failed to establish that the admission of such evidence requires reversal. Applying an incorrect standard of review, Gray also contends that the judgment should be reversed because the evidence sufficed to establish negligence on the part of Perez and Mejia. Court find that substantial evidence supports the verdicts. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Gray v. MIF of San Francisco