In re Miguel O.
Rosa O. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile courts order made in a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]hearing establishing a plan of adoption for her daughter, Viviana O., and her son, Hugo O. Mother contends on appeal that the juvenile court erred in terminating her parental rights because the court had failed to enforce its visitation order, and impermissibly delegated to the children the decision whether visitation would occur. She asserts that as a result she did not have the opportunity to maintain or establish a beneficial parental relationship, which could have been a basis upon which she could oppose the termination of her parental rights. Court disagree and affirm the challenged order.
Comments on In re Miguel O.