In re M.L.
At the six-month review hearing in this juvenile dependency case, the court modified the reunification plan of appellant S.L. (father) by ordering him to participate in a domestic violence counseling program, and denied his request for a continuance of the hearing to contest the additional required program. On appeal, father contends that the denial of his request constituted an abuse of the juvenile courts discretion and impaired his right to effective assistance of counsel. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re M.L.