legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Nair
This case involves consolidated appeals filed by Jayraj Nair (father) from four orders in which the family law court, inter alia, limited him to supervised visitation with his youngest son, substituted therapists for both sons, and awarded to respondent Bindu Nair (mother) attorney fees pursuant to Family Code section 271. Father contends the trial court erred by (1) ordering supervised visitation, (2) modifying a final custody order absent a showing of changed circumstances, (3) prohibiting his sons from having contact with each other, (4) ordering him to pay to mother $75,000 as a sanction for increasing the cost of litigation, and (5) making various provisions for therapy in the ruling after the custody trial.
Mother argues that fathers appeal from the three orders concerning visitation and therapy must be dismissed because they are nonappealable interim custody orders.
Court shall conclude that father has properly appealed from the four orders. However, we reject his arguments and shall affirm the trial courts orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale