P. v. Mejia
A jury convicted appellant Ernesto Antonio Mejia of purchasing a stolen vehicle, knowing it was stolen, and of driving without a validlicense. In a separate hearing, the trial court found true that Mejia had served a prior prison term. Mejia raises numerous claims of prejudicial error: (1) discriminatory use of peremptory challenges; (2) instructional error; and (3) prosecutorial misconduct. In addition, he asks this court to review personnel records of the police department to determine if all discoverable material was released by the trial court.
Comments on P. v. Mejia