P. v. Gruneau
A jury convicted defendant Mark Thomas Grunau of annoying a child under the age of 18 and loitering on school grounds, and defendant admitted having two strike prior convictions. (Pen. Code, 647.6, 653, subd. (g), 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.)[1] On appeal from the judgment, he claims there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for annoying a child. He also claims the court erred in admitting evidence of prior sexual misconduct.
Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Gruneau