legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Palmeno
Defendant Francisco Palmeno was convicted of three counts of lewd conduct (Pen. Code, 288, subd. (a)) on his two granddaughters, and the jury found true an allegation that he had committed these offenses on more than one victim (Pen. Code, 667.61, subd. (e)(5), 1203.066, subd. (a)(7)). He was committed to state prison to serve a term of 15 years to life. On appeal, he contends that his convictions must be reversed because the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 1108 of his prior sexual offenses against his two stepdaughters over defendants Evidence Code section 352 objection. He also contends that the courts AIDS testing order is not supported by probable cause and that the Penal Code section 290.3 fine was imposed in the wrong amount. We find no cause for reversal of his convictions, but we find merit in his other contentions. Therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings regarding the AIDS testing order, correction of the amount of the Penal Code section 290.3 fine, and specification of the penalty assessments applicable to that fine. Court also direct the trial court to correct a mistake on the abstract of judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale