legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.V.
T.V. the mother of A.V. appeals the juvenile dependency courts order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 388 petition seeking return of the minor to her custody, or liberalized visitation or conjoint counseling. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude the juvenile dependency court did not abuse its discretion in ruling on the petition. The court granted the request for conjoint counseling and properly denied the other relief because T.V. failed to show a change of circumstances or the proposed changes would benefit A.V. Accordingly Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale