In re A.V.
T.V. the mother of A.V. appeals the juvenile dependency courts order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 388 petition seeking return of the minor to her custody, or liberalized visitation or conjoint counseling. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude the juvenile dependency court did not abuse its discretion in ruling on the petition. The court granted the request for conjoint counseling and properly denied the other relief because T.V. failed to show a change of circumstances or the proposed changes would benefit A.V. Accordingly Court affirm.
Comments on In re A.V.