legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gonzalez
Defendant Manuel Mata Gonzalez was arrested following a carjacking and high speed chase through the streets of Paramount. He was convicted on count one of carjacking and on count two of evading a peace officer. As to count one, gang and weapon allegations were found true. On appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the gang enhancement under Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1) as well as the propriety of his sentence on count one. Defendant also filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Respondent also challenges defendants sentence on count two and claims the trial court failed to order sufficient court security fees.
Court conclude (i) substantial evidence does not support the gang enhancement, (ii) the sentence on count two is unclear due to disparity between the reporters transcript, abstract of judgment and sentencing minute order, and must be reversed, and (iii) the trial court failed to assess sufficient court security fees. Court deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale