P.v. Banks
William E. Banks appeals from a modified judgment that was entered after a remand from this court. He contends (1) the trial court violated the principles articulated in People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero) and its progeny when it declined to strike a prior conviction, (2) the court erred when awarding custody credits, and (3) the abstract of judgment contains an error that could be corrected. We conclude appellants second and third arguments have merit and will order the appropriate modifications. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on P.v. Banks