P. v. Erickson
Cynthia Lee Erickson appeals a conviction of operating a vessel under the influence of an alcoholic beverage causing injury. She contends the trial court: (1) erroneously permitted a prosecution witness to testify as to the cause of the accident; (2) improperly instructed the jury; (3) had a sua sponte duty to give lesser included offense instructions; and (4) abused its discretion by denying probation. She also contends that the cumulative effect of these errors warrants reversal of the judgment. As Court shall explain, we reject Erickson's individual claims of error. Because there were no individual errors, there is no cumulative error and we need not address this claim.
Comments on P. v. Erickson