legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Whitall
Appellant, Raymond Whitall, was found guilty after a jury trial of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, 459, count one), attempted extortion ( 524, count two), and impersonating a public officer, investigator, or inspector ( 146a, subd. (b), count three). In a bifurcated proceeding, appellant waived his right to a jury trial and admitted four prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of the three strikes law ( 667, subds. (a)-(i) & 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)).
On December 2, 2008, the trial court denied appellants request pursuant to section 1385 to strike one or more of his prior serious felony convictions. The court sentenced appellant to prison for 25 years to life on count one. It imposed the same sentence on counts two and three, but stayed sentence on those counts pursuant to section 654. The court imposed a restitution fine and awarded applicable custody credits. Appellant contends the trial court abused its sentencing discretion in failing to dismiss one or more of his prior serious felony convictions pursuant to People v. SuperiorCourt (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale