Marriage of Bareket and Marcus
In this family law matter, respondent Stacy Lynn Marcus appeals from two postjudgment orders. The first is an order denying her request to modify child support. Stacy[1] challenges that order on the ground, among others, that the existing child support amount was below the statutory guideline. (Fam. Code, 4050 et seq.)[2] The second order determined the status of assets that Stacy claimed were omitted from the original division of community property. As to it, Stacy argues that she was deprived of due process when the trial court met with the forensic accountants in her absence. She also maintains that the court erred in awarding petitioner Ittai Bareket his attorney fees as the prevailing party in a prior motion. Stacy has demonstrated error only with regard to the final argument. Court shall modify the order to strike the attorney fees award and, as modified, affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Bareket and Marcus