In re C.D.
C.D. appeals from an order of wardship (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) following a finding he made a criminal threat in violation of Penal Code section 422. He was placed home on probation, and the court specified a maximum term of physical confinement of three years. He contends the court abused its discretion in refusing his request to reopen the evidentiary portion of the trial to allow him to testify, and that the court erred in specifying a maximum period of confinement. For the reasons stated, we strike the maximum period of confinement and otherwise affirm.
Comments on In re C.D.