P. v. Zahkarchenko
Convicted of numerous crimes arising out of two armed home invasion robberies, defendant Vadim Zakharchenko appeals, contending the case must be remanded for resentencing because: (1) the trial court was mistaken about its sentencing discretion; and (2) the trial court used an improper reason to justify imposition of consecutive sentences in one of the incidents. In the event we deem his second argument forfeited because he did not object in the trial court, defendant contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no merit in defendants arguments, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Zahkarchenko