legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.T.
April V. and Jorge T. appeal a judgment terminating their parental rights to their minor children, N.T. and Delilah T. (together, the minors), under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. April contends: (1) because she was a minor, the court committed reversible error when it did not appoint her a guardian ad litem; (2) the court erred when it denied April reunification services for N.T.; (3) the court abused its discretion when it did not place the minors with their paternal grandmother; and (4) the court erred by summarily denying her section 388 petition for modification seeking to have the minors returned to her custody, or alternatively, further reunification services. April further contends, in a separate "Application for Constructive Filing of Notice of Appeal" (Application), that the court did not inform her of her right to seek appellate review after the court terminated services at a July 21, 2008, disposition hearing. Jorge argues that the court erred by denying his section 388 petition for modification seeking placement of the minors with their paternal grandmother. Jorge further joins in April's arguments. Court affirm the judgment and deny the Application.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale