P. v. Ramirez
Defendant, Leonardo Ramirez, pleaded no contest to felony evasion of a police officer (Veh. Code, 2800.2, subd. (a)). He claims that (1) a probation condition, as pronounced orally, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and (2) a minute order does not properly reflect the trial courts orally announced disposition in a minor respect. Court will modify the probation condition and minute order to cure any infirmity or incongruity. With these modifications, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ramirez