legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Phan
Defendant was charged by first amended information with committing lewd acts on a child under 14 (Pen. Code, 288, subd. (a);[1] count 1), and misdemeanor annoying or molesting a child ( 647.6, subd. (a)(1); count 2). The alleged victim of the charges was L., a then 13-year-old child with developmental disabilities. Defendant was seen at the Milpitas Counseling Center for a comprehensive psychodiagnostic assessment at his counsels request four times between November 16, 2007, and January 2, 2008. Although defendant was diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, no major psychopathological condition was diagnosed. On July 28, 2008, defendant filed a motion to compel L. to undergo a psychiatric examination to determine her competency to testify. The prosecutor filed opposition to the motion. On August 8, 2008, the court denied the motion without prejudice.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale