Marriage of Nordstrom
Appellant Rebecca Nordstrom (Rebecca) challenges the trial courts judgment that Respondent David Nordstroms (Davids) accumulated vacation and sick leave had no cash value as of the date of separation and thus were not a community property asset. As discussed below, we affirm the trial courts judgment based on the rule set forth in In re Marriage of Lorenz (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 464 (Lorenz), because David could not have exchanged his leave hours for money as of the date of separation.
Comments on Marriage of Nordstrom