N.O.v. Super. Ct.
N.O. seeks extraordinary relief from the orders of the juvenile court terminating reunification services and setting a permanent plan selection hearing in the dependency case of her daughter, B.P. She contends there is no substantial evidence to support the courts finding that she was offered reasonable reunification services or that there was no substantial probability of return to her custody within the next six months. The father, Daniel P., joins in the mothers petition without making any arguments on his own behalf. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.200(a)(5).) We find substantial evidence supports the findings and deny relief.
Comments on N.O.v. Super. Ct.