legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Taylor
Appellants Derek H. Taylor and Debra Ann Sangster were convicted after a joint jury trial of possession of methamphetamine for sale. Both appealed, each raising different and unrelated issues. Taylor contends that he, or at least his trial counsel, should have been permitted to attend a pretrial hearing regarding whether the prosecution was obligated to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. He also contends that his rights were violated when, while he was handcuffed during a search of his apartment, a police officer asked him for the combination to a safe so the police could open and search it.
For her part, Sangster contends that her mid-trial motion to sever her case from Taylors should have been granted. She also argues that during closing argument, the prosecutor improperly commented on her post arrest silence and decision not to testify. Court reject all of the arguments raised by Taylor and Sangster on appeal, and affirm their convictions and sentences.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale