In re M.P.
Defendant M.M. is the father of one-year-old M.P., a dependent child of the juvenile court. The juvenile court terminated Fathers parental rights. Father does not challenge that order on appeal. Rather, he asks that we correct two of the juvenile courts findings of jurisdiction: (1) that Father had previously been convicted of sexual abuse as defined in Penal Code section 11165.1; and (2) that Father had admitted committing conduct constituting sexual abuse. Father contends the jurisdictional findings are not supported by substantial evidence. We reject Fathers contention because he has waived the issue and because the findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record.
Comments on In re M.P.