legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Thimmes
David Thimmes appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by a jury of making a criminal threat (Pen. Code, 422)[1]and stalking. ( 646.9, subd. (a).) Appellant admitted allegations of two prior prison terms ( 667.5, subd. (b)) and one prior serious or violent felony conviction within the meaning of the "Three Strikes" law. ( 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d); 667, subds. (b)-(i).) At the time of sentencing, the prosecutor informed the court that only one of the prior prison terms was valid. Appellant was sentenced to prison for eight years, four months. Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale