P. v. Roberson
Defendant and appellant Michael Roberson (defendant) appeals from the trial courts ruling on his Pitchess[1]motion, arguing that we have a duty to review the trial courts in camera proceeding on his motion to determine whether any discoverable police personnel records were incorrectly withheld. Based on our review of the transcript of the in camera proceeding, Court conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that there were no discoverable police personnel records. Court therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Roberson