legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hoard
A jury convicted appellant William Hale Hoard III of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211, 212.5, subd. (c); count 1), a felony, and resisting, delaying or obstructing a peace officer (Pen. Code, 148, subd. (a)(1), count 2), a misdemeanor. The jury also found true enhancement allegations that appellant personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon in committing the count 1 offense (Pen. Code, 12022, subd. (b)(1)) and that he had served a prison term for a prior felony conviction (Pen. Code, 667.5, subd. (b)). The court imposed a prison term of five years, consisting of the three-year midterm on count 1 plus one year on each of the two enhancements. On count 2, the court imposed a concurrent 90-day term in county jail. On appeal, appellants sole contention is that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct in violation of Griffin v. California (1965) 380 U.S. 609 (Griffin), by commenting on appellants failure to testify at trial. Court will affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale