legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Alcala v. Superior Court
Petitioner Rodney James Alcala contends he was denied his constitutional right to represent himself when the trial court denied his motion under the United States Supreme Court decision in Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806. The Orange County and Los Angeles County District Attorney Offices were invited to file an informal response to the petition for a writ of prohibition/mandate and the Orange County District Attorney advises this court that based on Alcalas reaffirmation of the Faretta waivers and his representation that he would not seek a continuance, the petition should be granted. Court agree and the petition is granted.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale