Beyer v. Boyland
Plaintiff and appellant Fritz G. Beyer appeals from a judgment entered following a grant of nonsuit as to his claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage against defendant and respondent William Boyland. Beyer contends that nonsuit was improper because he submitted sufficient facts to establish a right to recovery under the theories pleaded. Court hold that the trial court properly granted nonsuit on these claims. He also contends that we should read his complaint as encompassing a cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations. Even if this theory has not been waived or forfeited for failing to assert it below, Court reject this contention. Accordingly, Court will affirm the judgment.
Comments on Beyer v. Boyland