In re A.T.
A. T., father of the minors, appeals from orders of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights as to two of his girls. (Welf. & Inst. Code,[1] 366.26, 395.) Appellant contends the court erred in finding he was an alleged, rather than a presumed, father. He further asserts that he was denied due process because he did not have proper notice of the proceedings or timely appointment of counsel and that the evidence does not support the courts finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq. did not apply. Court reverse for compliance with the notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
Comments on In re A.T.