legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Johnson
A jury found defendant Robert David Johnson guilty of first degree residential robbery (Pen. Code, 211, 213, subd. (a)(1)(A); all statutory citations are to the Penal Code unless indicated), two counts of felon in possession of a firearm ( 12021, subd. (a)(1)), false impersonation ( 529, subd. 3), possession of counterfeit bills ( 476), and two counts of dissuading a witness ( 136.1, subd. (a)(1)). The jury also found to be true the allegation a principal used a firearm during commission of the robbery ( 12022.53, subds. (b) & (e)) and that defendant committed the crimes of robbery and dissuading a witness to benefit a criminal street gang. The trial court found defendant previously suffered a prior serious felony conviction within the meaning of the Three Strikes law and section 667, subdivision (a)(1), and had served a prior prison term ( 667.5, subd. (b).) Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain one of the counts of witness dissuasion and its accompanying gang enhancement. He also contends the trial court erred by admitting a nontestifying victims pretrial statement to a police detective, and argues the trial court committed various sentencing errors. Court reverse in part as explained below.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale