Unnamed Physician v. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, its medical executive committee (MEC), and its board of directors (collectively Hoag), all of whom were involved in a review of the petitioner physicians[1] professional competency, appeal from the trial courts issuance of a writ of mandate setting aside Hoags letter of censure and imposition of probation in connection with the physicians medical staff privileges. Hoag argues the court lacked jurisdiction to review the decision because no hearing was required at the hospital level, and because its decision to issue the writ was contrary to law. Court are not persuaded.
Comments on Unnamed Physician v. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian