legal news


Register | Forgot Password

J.L. v. Childrens Insititute
Plaintiffs and appellants J.L., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem D.L., appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent the Childrens Institute, Inc. (CII) following a grant of summary judgment on appellants complaint for negligence. Appellant was sexually assaulted by a 14 year old while in a family day care home to which CII referred him. The trial court ruled that CII owed no duty to protect appellant from the harm suffered. Court affirm. CII owed no duty to protect against an unforeseeable criminal assault, nor was it vicariously liable for any possible breach of duty by the day care provider.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale