P. v. Gauldin
Mario Gauldin appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court found him guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm and a jury found him guilty of burglary, robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft of a firearm, making a criminal threat and evading an officer. He appeals, contending the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his request to sit in the audience during the victim's in-court identification. He also asserts the trial court erred in (1) using his prior juvenile adjudications as strikes and (2) imposing consecutive terms based on facts not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Finally, in his petition for writ of habeas corpus, he contends his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the in Court identification procedure used for his cohorts. Court reject his arguments, affirm the judgment and deny his habeas corpus petition.
Comments on P. v. Gauldin