J.S. v. Super. Ct.
Petitioners D.S. (mother) and J.S. (father) filed separate petitions for extraordinary writ pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.452, challenging the juvenile courts order terminating reunification services as to their child, S.S. (the child) and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 366.26 hearing. Mother and father (the parents) argue that: 1) they were not provided with reasonable reunification services; and 2) the court erred in finding it detrimental to return the child to their care. Mother additionally contends that the court erred in admitting her psychological evaluations into evidence since the evaluations did not specify how it would be detrimental to place the child in her care. Court deny the writ petitions.
Comments on J.S. v. Super. Ct.