P. v. Adams
Defendant Marlon Vincent Adams was convicted of inflicting corporal injury on the mother of his child. On appeal, he contends (1) the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his prior acts of domestic violence, (2) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on proximate cause, (3) the trial court erred by failing to instruct on an element of the great bodily injury enhancement, (4) the rap sheet was unreliable and therefore served as insufficient evidence to support the prior conviction finding, (5) the trial court erred by imposing the upper term and (6) the trial court erred by imposing the upper term on the enhancement. Court affirm.



Comments on P. v. Adams