Lair v. Vinci
Plaintiff Marc Lair appeals from a supplemental postjudgment order in execution of a judgment for property (Code Civ. Proc., 714.020, subds. (b), (c))[1] determining the value of certain personal property (a navigation/communication system or GPS) to be $9,000 and awarding that amount to defendant Ronald Vinci. Lair contends (1) the trial court violated his due process rights by admitting oral testimony from Vinci's witnesses at a hearing on that matter and (2) the navigation system, which had been installed in an aircraft awarded to Vinci in a judgment for possession, was not included within that judgment and cannot be subject to the supplemental order under section 714.020. Court reject these contentions and affirm the order.
Comments on Lair v. Vinci