In re L.K.
L.K. appeals from orders terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to his two children.[1] Appellants appointed appellate counsel submitted a letter dated September 16, 2008, advising that no brief would be forthcoming (In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952). We extended time for appellant to personally file a letter brief, which he eventually did in November 2008. In his letter, appellant asks us to reconsider the trial courts denial of his section 388 petition for reunification services. Having reviewed the appellate record as summarized below, Court conclude appellants remarks do not amount to claims that the juvenile court committed an error affecting the outcome of this case (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994) and will affirm.
Comments on In re L.K.