P. v. Warzek
A jury convicted defendant Michael Randal Warzek of aggravated sexual assault upon a child under 14 (counts 1 and 2), lewd act upon a child 14 or 15 (count 3), lewd act upon a child under 14 by force or fear (counts 4, 5 and 6), and possession of child pornography (count 7). On appeal, defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred by admitting over objection the evidence of child pornography despite his offer to plead guilty to count 7, (2) the trial court erred by overruling his objection that the prosecutors cross-examination of him exceeded the scope of the direct testimony, (3) the trial court erred by overruling his objection that an attorney-client privilege barring certain testimony had been waived, and (4) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to object to the prosecutors cross examination of him that called for inadmissible and prejudicial answers. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Warzek