P. v. Hawkins
Dennis Hawkins appeals from a judgment of the Solano County Superior Court following the courts revocation of his probation after his plea of no contest to possession of cocaine base. (Health & Saf. Code, 11350, subd. (a).) Appellant asserts, and respondent Attorney General concedes, that the court erred in imposing a second restitution fine of $400 pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.4,[1]where it had originally imposed a $200 restitution fine pursuant to section 1202.4 upon granting probation. Respondent also concedes that the court erred in imposing and suspending a parole revocation fine pursuant to section 1202.45 in the amount of $400, as the mandatory stayed parole restitution fine imposed under section 1202.45 must be identical in amount to the restitution imposed under section 1202.4.
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Hawkins