legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Settanni
In May 2005, Jay Richard Settanni (Settanni) was charged by information with eight counts of committing lewd acts with a child under the age of 14. (Pen. Code, 288, subd. (a).)[1] The acts were alleged to have occurred between January 1, 2000, and May 28, 2004, and to have involved a single child, E.D.[2] The information further alleged that with respect to count 1 of the information Settanni had digitally penetrated the childs vagina or rectum, an enhancement allegation that if proven precludes a grant of probation. ( 1203.066, subd. (a)(8).) However, the district attorney dismissed this enhancement allegation on grounds of insufficiency of the evidence at the conclusion of the prosecutions case in chief. On February 14, 2007, a jury convicted Settanni on all counts, and less than a month later, the trial court sentenced Settanni to a nine year prison term. Settanni filed a timely appeal. The judgment is therefore reversed and the matter remanded for a new trial. Court dismiss the appeal as moot because it addresses trial issues not relevant to the case on remand.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale