legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.H.
T.H. (mother), the mother of M.H. (daughter) appeals from the juvenile courts denial of her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition. She contends the court erred in denying the petition because she demonstrated a change in circumstances and that further services were in daughters best interest. Mother also appeals from the termination of her parental rights after a section 366.26 permanency hearing (the .26 hearing). She contends the court erred by not applying the beneficial relationship exception set forth in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i). Court affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale