In re D.A.
D. A. (D.), the appellant, was committed to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice (Division of Juvenile Justice) after he admitted he committed a forcible lewd act against a child under the age of 14. He appeals, claiming the juvenile court abused its discretion because it rejected less restrictive alternatives without substantial evidence they would be inadequate. Court affirm the order of the juvenile court.
Comments on In re D.A.