P. v. Robinson
Defendant Herman Ray Robinson pled no contest to carjacking (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a)),[1]attempted murder ( 664/187, subd. (a)), and second degree robbery ( 211/212.5, subd. (c)). Defendant also pled no contest to special allegations that he personally used a firearm in the commission of the carjacking and robbery ( 12022.53, subd. (b)), and that he committed the robbery with the specific intent to benefit of a criminal street gang ( 186.22, subd. (b)(1)). In exchange for his plea, the People agreed to dismiss the remaining counts and enhancement allegations, and defendant was promised a determinate term of 25 years in state prison. Following an unsuccessful motion to withdraw his plea, the trial court sentenced defendant to 25 years in state prison and imposed various other orders, including direct victim restitution pursuant to section 1202.4, subdivision (f).
Defendants sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to clarify that the victim restitution orders imposed in this case are joint and several obligations shared by his codefendants. Finding no merit in this argument, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Robinson