Hasso v. Hasso
Appellant May Hasso (May) appeals from an order denying her anti-SLAPP motion[1] to strike respondent Helene Hassos (Helene) first amended probate petition.[2] The court correctly denied the motion because Helenes petition arises from Mays alleged failure as a trustee to distribute trust income to her. This conduct is not protected by the anti-SLAPP statute. Helenes petition does not arise from Mays protected act of petitioning for instructions about the alleged trust income. Court affirm.
Comments on Hasso v. Hasso