P. v. Daviesson
Eric Christopher Daviesson admitted violating his probation. He appeals following the trial courts imposition of a previously stayed three-year prison sentence for receiving stolen property. Daviesson contends the court lost jurisdiction under Penal Code[1]section 1203.2a to impose execution of his sentence because he was not committed to prison within 60 days after the court was notified that he was confined in a state prison following his conviction for an unrelated offense. Daviesson also argues he was entitled to an award of custody credits in excess of those ordered by the trial court for time he was in prison and awaiting imposition of his three-year sentence. We conclude Daviesson failed to show that the court was notified as required by section 1203.2a that he was in prison for an unrelated offense. We also conclude there was no error in calculating his custody credits. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Daviesson