legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ware
Willie Ware appeals from his convictions on one count of possessing cocaine and one count of selling cocaine. Ware contends that (1) the prosecution impermissibly used a peremptory challenge to strike a prospective juror on racial grounds, and (2) the admission of evidence relating to laboratory reports (including the reports themselves) that were prepared by a criminalist who did not testify violated Wares rights under the Confrontation Clause. Court disagree with both contentions and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale