P. v. Cordova
Following a jury trial, defendant and appellant Roberto Cordova (defendant) was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon, a baseball bat. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it refused to instruct the jury on self-defense. We hold that the trial court did not err by refusing to instruct on self-defense because the evidence did not warrant such an instruction. Court therefore affirm the judgment of conviction.
Comments on P. v. Cordova