In re A.F.
T.A. and J.F., the mother and father of minor A.F., appeal from the order terminating their parental rights after a Welfare and Institutions Code section[1] 366.26 hearing. Appellants contend[2] that substantial evidence did not support the order because mother met the continuing beneficial relationship exception contained in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i)[3] and that the court erroneously terminated their parental rights because proper notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) had not been perfected. Although mother did not meet the continuing beneficial relationship exception, Court reverse and remand with directions solely to ensure compliance with ICWA.
Comments on In re A.F.