P. v. Fabros
Fabros contends insufficient evidence supported the convictions on counts 1 through 11, and the trial court erred by restricting the psychologist's testimony under the psychotherapist-patient privilege. Court affirm.
P. v. Fabros
Fabros contends insufficient evidence supported the convictions on counts 1 through 11, and the trial court erred by restricting the psychologist's testimony under the psychotherapist-patient privilege. Court affirm.
Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Fabros