In re T.P.
J.P. (father) appeals as error (1) the juvenile courts denial of his request for a continuance of the permanency planning hearing regarding his two children, (2) the denial of his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions, and (3) the courts failure to make a specific visitation order. Court affirm.

Comments on In re T.P.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced