P. v. Lewis
Defendant and appellant Kenneth Lewis appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of possession of heroin for sale.[1] He contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the judgment; (2) the trial court failed to instruct that an experts opinion is circumstantial evidence; and (3) imposition of the upper term violated the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely). Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Lewis